Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Primacy 5

8.4

R16 – R21

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Ecsta HS52

Primacy 5

Number of tests

4

10

3

Best position

#5

#2

#1

Average position

10.3

6.0

4.7

Latest test

2018

2026

Available sizes

—

104

126

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Energy Saver +

Ecsta HS52

Primacy 5

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison