18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Michelin Energy Saver +

Michelin

Energy Saver +

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Michelin Energy Saver + was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested.

Test Profile

Michelin

Energy Saver +

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

4

10

Best position

#5

#2

Average position

10.3

6.0

Latest test

2018

2026

Available sizes

—

104

Wet

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Costs

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Dry

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Comfort

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison