18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Number of tests
4
13
3
Best position
#5
#4
#5
Average position
10.3
6.3
7.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
1

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison