Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13

VS

Upper-middle

Kleber

Quadraxer 3

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Quadraxer 3

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

13

3

Best position

#5

#4

#2

Average position

10.3

6.3

3.7

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

—

111

34

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

72%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

70%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Michelin Energy Saver +

55%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

66%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

77%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Energy Saver +

Quadraxer 3

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison