18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
4
11
18
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
11.6
6.1
Latest test
2018
2024
2024
Available sizes
121
47

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison