18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
4
13
18
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
10.3
6.2
6.1
Latest test
2018
2026
2024
Available sizes
530
47

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison