18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4Premium
PirelliPirelli

P ZERO PZ4

9.1
R13 – R23
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
4
3
14
Best position
#5
#2
#2
Average position
10.3
3.3
5.5
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
—
60
706

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison