Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Premium

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Ventus Evo

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

4

3

15

Best position

#5

#2

Average position

10.3

3.3

9.0

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

60

225

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Price/value

Michelin Energy Saver +

55%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Energy Saver +

Ventus Evo

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison