18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
4
3
15
Best position
#5
#2
#2
Average position
10.3
3.3
9.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
60
225

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison