18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
3
3
5
Best position
#5
#2
#2
#1
Average position
10.3
3.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
60
34
63

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison