18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Hankook
ION Evo
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
4
1
14
Best position
#5
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
1.0
5.5
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
64
706

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison