18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Number of tests
4
1
13
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
1.0
4.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
—
64
123

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison