18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
1
3
Best position
#5
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
—
64
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison