18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
4
3
24
Best position
#5
#5
#1
Average position
10.3
7.3
2.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
1
150

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison