18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Number of tests
4
3
13
Best position
#5
#5
#4
Average position
10.3
7.3
6.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
1
111

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison