18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than GoodYear (75%). The first tyre test of Michelin Energy Saver + was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested.

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
4
23
Best position
#5
#1
Average position
10.3
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
Available sizes
176

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison