18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Number of tests
4
24
2
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
2.7
2.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
302
48

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison