18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Number of tests
4
24
3
Best position
#5
#1
#4
Average position
10.3
2.7
4.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
302
97

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison