18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
4
24
14
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
2.7
3.6
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
302
188

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison