18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than GoodYear (75%). The first tyre test of Michelin Energy Saver + was done in 2016, compared to 2023 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 first tested.

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
4
24
Best position
#5
#1
Average position
10.3
2.7
Latest test
2018
2025
Available sizes
302

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison