18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
4
3
3
6
Best position
#5
#2
#1
#3
Average position
10.3
3.3
4.7
4.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
40
126
146

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison