18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
3
1
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
10.3
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
40
64

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison