18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
3
26
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
10.3
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
40
66

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison