18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Number of tests
4
3
13
Best position
#5
#2
#2
Average position
10.3
3.3
6.2
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
Available sizes
40
225

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
62%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison