Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Number of tests

4

5

3

1

Best position

#5

#1

#2

#1

Average position

10.3

2.2

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

63

40

64

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Energy Saver +

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison