18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
5
3
Best position
#5
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
—
63
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison