18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Number of tests
4
5
36
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
2.2
3.1
Latest test
2018
2025
2023
Available sizes
63
296

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison