18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
4
18
3
Best position
#5
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
6.1
3.3
Latest test
2018
2024
2026
Available sizes
47
60

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison