18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Number of tests
4
18
36
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
6.1
3.1
Latest test
2018
2024
2023
Available sizes
47
296

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison