18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Budget
GoodrideGoodride

Solmax 1

3.9
R17 – R22
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodride
Solmax 1
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
4
1
6
Best position
#5
#8
#3
Average position
10.3
8.0
4.7
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
Available sizes
—
46
146

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodride Solmax 1
49%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodride Solmax 1
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodride Solmax 1
46%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodride Solmax 1
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodride Solmax 1
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodride Solmax 1
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodride Solmax 1
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodride Solmax 1
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodride Solmax 1
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodride Solmax 1
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison