Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Budget

Goodride

Solmax 1

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Solmax 1

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

1

3

Best position

#5

#8

#2

Average position

10.3

8.0

3.7

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

—

46

34

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Goodride Solmax 1

49%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Goodride Solmax 1

61%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Goodride Solmax 1

54%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Goodride Solmax 1

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Energy Saver +

Solmax 1

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison