18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone
Roadhawk
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
4
21
6
Best position
#5
#2
#3
Average position
10.3
11.9
4.7
Latest test
2018
2024
2026
Available sizes
164
146

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison