Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

Roadhawk 2

8.0

R16 – R22

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Roadhawk

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

4

21

6

Best position

#5

#2

#3

Average position

10.3

11.9

4.7

Latest test

2018

2024

2026

Available sizes

—

164

146

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Price/value

Michelin Energy Saver +

55%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Energy Saver +

Roadhawk

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison