18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Cooper Zeon CS8

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone
Roadhawk
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Number of tests
4
21
14
Best position
#5
#2
#9
Average position
10.3
11.9
19.7
Latest test
2018
2024
2024
Available sizes
164
145

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Wet Handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
98%
Cooper Zeon CS8
94%
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
89%
Cooper Zeon CS8
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
89%
Cooper Zeon CS8
91%
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Dry Performance
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Cooper Zeon CS8
92%
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Dry Handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Cooper Zeon CS8
92%
Comfort & Noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone Roadhawk
22%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Cooper Zeon CS8
82%
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Noise Exterior
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
22%
Cooper Zeon CS8
82%
Economy
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Cooper Zeon CS8
41%
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Rolling Resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
51%
Cooper Zeon CS8
20%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Cooper Zeon CS8
62%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2018195/65 R15View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison