18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
21
26
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
10.3
11.9
2.2
Latest test
2018
2024
2026
Available sizes
164
66

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison