18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
4
6
15
Best position
#5
#3
#2
Average position
10.3
4.7
9.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
146
225

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison