18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
6
5
3
Best position
#5
#3
#1
#2
Average position
10.3
4.7
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
146
63
34

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison