Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

6

3

Best position

#5

#3

#2

Average position

10.3

4.7

3.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

146

34

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Energy Saver +

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison