Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

Cinturato P7 C2

8.9

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

e.Ziex

Cinturato P7 C2

Number of tests

4

3

9

Best position

#5

#2

Average position

10.3

3.7

5.8

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

—

34

92

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

82%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

86%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

81%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

66%

Mileage

Michelin Energy Saver +

94%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

65%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

70%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

88%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

85%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

87%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Energy Saver +

e.Ziex

Cinturato P7 C2

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison