Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

9.4

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

4

3

4

Best position

#5

#2

#1

Average position

10.3

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

—

34

—

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Energy Saver +

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison