18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
4
3
3
Best position
#5
#2
#2
Average position
10.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
Available sizes
—
34
40

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison