18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
3
6
5
Best position
#5
#2
#3
#1
Average position
10.3
3.7
4.7
2.2
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
34
146
63

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison