Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

8.0

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

4

3

6

Best position

#5

#2

#3

Average position

10.3

3.7

4.7

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

—

34

146

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin Energy Saver +

95%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Energy Saver +

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison