18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
4
3
2
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
10.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
34
23

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison