Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

9.5

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

4

3

2

Best position

#5

#2

#1

Average position

10.3

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

—

34

23

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Energy Saver +

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison