18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
3
26
Best position
#5
#2
#1
Average position
10.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
Available sizes
—
34
66

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison