18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Dunlop Winter vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Dunlop
Winter
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
4
2
23
Best position
#5
#1
#1
Average position
10.3
1.5
3.3
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
65
176

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Dunlop Winter
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Dunlop Winter
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Dunlop Winter
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Dunlop Winter
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Dunlop Winter
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Dunlop Winter
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Dunlop Winter
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison