Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

Energy Saver +

R13

VS

Premium

Dunlop

Winter

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Energy Saver +

Winter

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

2

3

Best position

#5

#1

#2

Average position

10.3

1.5

3.7

Latest test

2018

2025

Available sizes

—

65

34

Wet

Michelin Energy Saver +

87%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

90%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin Energy Saver +

62%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Costs

Michelin Energy Saver +

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Michelin Energy Saver +

79%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Michelin Energy Saver +

96%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Michelin Energy Saver +

84%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex

Energy Saver +

Winter

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison