18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Cooper Zeon CS8Upper-middle
CooperCooper

Zeon CS8

3.3
R15 – R19
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
4
14
15
Best position
#5
#9
#2
Average position
10.3
19.7
9.0
Latest test
2018
2024
2025
Available sizes
—
145
225

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Price/value
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Cooper Zeon CS8
43%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison