18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Cooper
Zeon CS8
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
4
14
3
Best position
#5
#9
#2
Average position
10.3
19.7
3.3
Latest test
2018
2024
2026
Available sizes
145
40

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison