18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
4
14
5
6
Best position
#5
#9
#1
#3
Average position
10.3
19.7
2.2
4.7
Latest test
2018
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
145
63
146

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison