18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Cooper Zeon CS8Upper-middle
CooperCooper

Zeon CS8

3.3
R15 – R19
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
4
14
6
Best position
#5
#9
#3
Average position
10.3
19.7
4.7
Latest test
2018
2024
2026
Available sizes
—
145
146

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison