18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Michelin Energy Saver + vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Michelin Energy Saver +Premium
MichelinMichelin

Energy Saver +

R13 – R
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 SUV Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Test Profile

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
4
2
4
Best position
#5
#1
#3
Average position
10.3
1.0
12.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2025
Available sizes
—
23
111

Wet

Wet
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet circle cornering
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Wet handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%

Costs

Costs
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Rolling resistance
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Exterior noise
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Dry

Dry
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Dry handling
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison